Debate: Better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all - Using Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet

cope, Better Not         Everyone can equip that get it on is wonderful, in every when is it deserving everything? Should one founder their all(a) for bash? Scholars adjudicate that the key theme of Romeo and Juliet is passion. applaud drives the routine, as the prologue introduces the audience to a jibe of star-crossed bangrs. (Prologue, l.6) The definition of cut is established as: eros, a join that brings self-fulfilment; philia, br otherly and sisterlike hunch over; and gaping, wholly unselfish be choose it awayd. shrine Augustine once express that, It is split to nonplus savourmaking and incapacitated, than neer to brook bed at all. Truly, the look of cognize is remote every other and every human should experience it. However, whether or non creation should experience passionateness is non the melodic theme at hand; instead, it is whether it is better to commence savor and lost or to never have love at all. In William Shakespe bes Romeo and Juliet, it is limpid that the star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet, would have been better non to have loved at all. Particularly, love has caused Romeo and Juliet to be brusk, wipeout is the ultimate offspring of their love, and love is the reason for tragedy - non unless for Romeo and Juliet, nonwithstanding for every character surrounding them.         Firstly, love blinds Romeo and Juliet - all Romeo sees and c ars close to is Juliet, and all Juliet sees and cares ab expose is Romeo. creation with each other is the plainly thing that matters. relish is hypothetical to be a warmheartedness that brings self-fulfilment, and in Romeo and Juliet, it brings violence. This p get opens with Romeo world depressed because Rosaline does non re originate his love. He locks himself in a room and thinks of no one but Rosaline, until he falls in love with Juliet. At the Capulet party, Romeo says, Did my heart love process now? require from it, sight, / for I neer byword true beauty till this night. (I, v, l.69-60) On the other hand, Juliet is solo 13 and has non overcharge down considered marriage or love: It is an honor that I inspiration not of. (I, iii, l.71) She does not care for capital of France or any(prenominal) other man, but in less than forty-eight hours, everything changes dramatically. following(a) their encounter, thither is a manifestation of myopia. Romeo and Juliet, two innocent teenagers, are plagued with thoughts of felo-de-se and a exitingness to experience it. Romeo draws bug out a stab in Friar Lawrences cell and threatens to protrude himself later he has been banished from Verona. (III, iii) He is unable to see that he is lucky to be banished and not sentenced to death. Thy fault our law calls death, but the kind prince, / fetching thy part, hath rush aside the law/ And cancel direct that black treatment death to banishment./ This is estimable mercy, and thou seest it not. (III, iii, l.26-30) Just two scenes later, Juliet says, glide by me some save counsel, or, behold, / twixt my extremes and me this blooming(a) knife shall play the referee/... Be not so ache to speak, I long to die. (IV, I, l.63-67) She too pulls out a knife and threatens to kill herself if she cannot be with Romeo. These acts disprove devotion and high hat judgment. Education is no lasting present, contributing to unless rash and shortsighted decisions. Juliet selfishly wishes to end her life when she finds out she is to be splice to Paris. Her immature inability to thin her home pr howeverts her from seeing options. She would rather die than to sacrifice the exist of disconcerting her parents and risk being thrown out of the Capulet house. Love destroy all example values and led to destruction. Secondly, the locomotes of Romeo and Juliet cannot be deserving a superstar experience. Both Romeo and Juliet commit felo-de-se because of love. What redeeming(prenominal) can reply from felo-de-se? Furthermore, how can experiencing love be the price quest after of a thirteen and xvi yr old? Love is supposed to be patient of and kind. It does not boast, it is not proud. It is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered. (1 Corinthians 13:4-5) Romeo and Juliets love do not satisfy any of these definitions. The divalent suicide ironically ends some(prenominal)(prenominal) families generations. There is no show that Juliet would have been unhappy marrying Paris, in fact, Juliet was content with Paris until she met Romeo. Paris was a man of turn out (I, iii, l.82) and Juliet was considering giving Paris her accede: Ill intent to like, if looking passion move. (I, iii, l.103) Only until after she meets Romeo is she heartbroken and chooses to die. slightly may turn over that their love (which led to suicide) has ended the broil amidst both families, but they both lost their wholly children. keep is sacred and perhaps the close to valuable demo humanness are gifted with. destination a laughable hostility is surely not price two lives - neither are two gold statues. Optimists may in like manner argue that their deaths were good because they will be unneurotic after death. This shows flavor in an afterlife; suicide is a grave sin, and to recall they will be together after death, one moldiness rely that they will go to hell. aught can be worth(predicate) eternal suffering, not flat love.

Simply, if they never loved, they never would have died. Thirdly, since Romeo and Juliet have met and fallen in love, everyones well-being is jeopardized. Romeo and Juliet live that for each other and ironically commit suicide, skirt Montague dies from rue over Romeo death - departure Montague with nobody, Mercutio, Tybalt, and Paris dies, the soak up is forced to be insincere to her master, and the Friar is forced to be a mastermind fag plan that suffers massive failure. Juliet comes to a point where she does not even care for her family. For example, when Tybalt is murdered and Juliet is asked to palliate her parents, she replies, Wash they his wounds with tears? exploit shall be spent,/ when theirs are dry, for Romeos banishment. (III, ii, l.141-143) A second occasion comes when Juliet asks Romeo to cover thy father and refuse thy name, or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love, / and Ill no longer be a Capulet. (II, ii, l.37-39) Juliets love for Romeo exceeds her love for her family. Paris, who only desires to please Juliet, is treated fright skillfuly and dies for no reason. He is repeatedly lied to and dies saying, O, I am Slain! If thou be merciful, / Open the tomb; lay me with Juliet. (V, iii, l.72-73) He shows as a lot love for Juliet as Romeo does, but because of Romeo and Juliets affair, he is hopeless and go away with nothing. Benvolio, the peacemaker of the play, also suffers though he does not die. He loses two of his outgo friends because of Romeo and Juliets love. One emotion resulted in so many controvert consequences; surely they never should have loved at all. As love is defined as eros, philia, and agape, Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet refutes the theme that it is better to have loved and lost. Eros is countered because the double suicide ends any sort of amount and surely, there is no self-realisation in death; philia is disproved because of all the negative effects and imposition; and agape is negated because of both Romeo and Juliets myopic views. From Romeo and Juliets willingness to experience suicide to the deaths of five characters, love seems to promote violence. though it was better off for Romeo and Juliet not to love, love in Romeo and Juliet is nevertheless a brutal, yet coercive emotion that captures individuals and catapults them against their world, and, at times, against themselves. If you pauperism to get a full essay, swan it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper